Demand Package Builder.
An app idea for personal injury law firms.

What the search found

Who pays

Personal injury law firms, paid per case or monthly.

The problem

Case managers say medical record review becomes a last minute scramble once the demand package is already on the attorney's desk. Firms with 3000 page files want a chronology and demand letter without hand building it from a blank page.

The gap

The strong players are broad case management suites or demand-only AI tools. The gap is the messy front end: pulling records from many providers, catching missing packets before review, and producing a specials calculation that ties each dollar to a source line. Firms still stitch provider portals, records requests and

Already out there

• EvenUp evenuplaw.com

  AI Drafts generates demand packages from the documented case file with line level citations. It assumes the case file is already complete and organized.

• AI Demand Pro demandpro.ai

  Upload case documents and the AI builds the demand. Handles drafting, not the records chase or gap detection upstream.

• CloudLex cloudlex.com

  Logs demands, offers and counteroffers and calculates fees, liens and client recovery. It is a management system, not a demand generator from raw records.

• CasePeer tavrn.ai

  Settlement calculators, demand trackers and PI reports. Medical chronologies and evidence backed demands depend on third party integrations.

People asking for it

• Medical record review guide chartrequest.com

  Says record review should not become a last minute scramble after the demand package is already on the attorney's desk, and that case managers need every provider and pending record in one workflow to catch gaps earlier.

• Demand AI thread reddit.com

  Firm staff comparing tools for medical chronology and demand letters on files of 3000 pages or less.

• Medical records management casepeer.com

  Says obtaining and organizing records is complex and time consuming, and that inefficient record management delays demand packages and settlements.

The big assumption

That firms will pay per case for a tool that only covers records to demand, rather than buying it as part of the case management system they already run.

Test it this week

Ask five PI case managers to send one redacted closed file and time how long it takes you to produce a cited chronology and specials sheet by hand. Charge for the second one.